The agent, the evals, and the exception queue. In production.

The Production Agent Build ships the agent, its integrations and a human exception queue in 4–10 weeks, with evals and monitoring running from the first day rather than bolted on at the end. Most agent projects stall because nobody can prove the thing is right. We ship the proof alongside the system.

Duration
4–10 weeks
For
Pilot and audit clients, and SaaS founders shipping AI features
Terms
Scope and fee fixed in writing before the build starts, against the pilot or audit evidence.
Scope a build →How we prove it works →
What you get

Inside the Production Agent Build

The agent, running in your stack

Integrated with the systems the work already flows through: TMS, ERP, CRM, inbox, document store, or your own product. Permissions and error handling built for real volume.

A human exception queue

Confidence thresholds route the uncertain cases to a person instead of guessing. The goal is to remove the routine ninety percent, not to pretend the last ten does not exist.

Evals from day one

A golden set and a scoring run that gates every change. When a prompt or a model is updated, you know whether accuracy moved before it reaches production.

Monitoring and an audit trail

Every extraction traceable to its source document and page, every automated action logged with its inputs, and live quality metrics from launch.

A runbook and handover

Documentation your team can operate from, plus thirty days of post-launch support. Full IP transfer on final payment.

How it runs

The shape of the engagement

Weeks 1–2
Workflow mapping, integration access, the golden set, and monitoring in place before the first feature ships.
Middle weeks
Build in two-week increments with a working demo at the end of each, scored against the golden set throughout.
Late weeks
Integrations, the exception queue, audit logging, and load testing against real volume.
Final weeks
Parallel running alongside the manual process, tuning thresholds, then handover.
Fit

This is for you if

  • A workflow is validated by a pilot, an audit, or painful experience
  • You are a SaaS team shipping an AI feature to customers and need it to hold up
  • The output feeds a regulated or client-facing process, so being wrong has a cost

It is not, if

  • You want a chatbot bolted onto a website
  • Nobody internally will own the system after handover
  • The requirement is still "we should do something with AI"
Questions

Before you book

Why does the eval harness matter so much?

Because without one you cannot answer the only question that matters: is it still right? Models change, prompts get edited, document formats drift. A system with no test set degrades silently, and in regulated work silent degradation is the expensive kind.

What sets 4 weeks versus 10?

The number of integrations, document families or tools, and the accuracy bar the workflow needs. Scope and fee are fixed in writing before the build starts, from the pilot or audit evidence.

Can you build an AI feature into our SaaS product?

Yes. The shape is the same: the feature, the integrations into your codebase, an exception path for low-confidence cases, and evals in your CI so your team can keep shipping changes safely.

Which systems do you integrate with?

The systems the work already flows through: TMS, ERP, CRM, document stores, and email. Where there is an API we use it; where there is not, we work with exports and file drops rather than pretending the integration is clean.

What happens if accuracy is not good enough?

You find out during the build, from the golden set, rather than in production. We would rather narrow the scope to the part that works than ship something nobody trusts.

Next step

Start with a measured answer.

Audit the agent you already run, or pilot one workflow on your own documents. Either way, you leave with a number you can check.

Book a 30-min call →See both tracks →