Switch models without breaking production.

Model Migration is an eval-gated switch to a newer or cheaper model, scored side by side on your own traffic. In 2–3 weeks you get quality, cost and latency compared case by case on a golden set, routing and caching where they pay off, and a cutover plan with a rollback path, so the decision rests on measurements rather than a benchmark someone else ran.

Duration
2–3 weeks
For
AI teams facing a model release, a deprecation notice, or a large inference bill
Terms
Fixed scope, agreed in writing before kickoff. Includes a golden set if you do not have one.
Book a migration call →How we prove it works →
What you get

Inside the Model Migration

A baseline on your golden set

Your current model scored on cases drawn from your own traffic. If you do not have a golden set, we build one first; it is part of the engagement.

A side-by-side scorecard

Each candidate model scored on the same cases for quality, cost per task and latency, with the regressions listed case by case rather than averaged away.

Routing and caching

Where the scorecard supports it, cheaper models handle the easy traffic and the expensive one handles the rest, with prompt and response caching where it holds up.

A cutover with rollback

A staged switch, gated on the eval, with a tested path back to the old model if production disagrees with the scorecard.

How it runs

The shape of the engagement

Week 1
Baseline the current model on your golden set, building or extending the set from your traces where needed.
Week 2
Candidate runs across the models in scope, and the side-by-side scorecard for quality, cost and latency.
Week 3
Routing and caching, the staged cutover with rollback, and the handover of the harness so the next migration is a re-run.
Works with

Plugs into what you already run

OpenAIAnthropicGoogleOpen-weight models you hostLiteLLM and gateway routers
Fit

This is for you if

  • A new model release looks better or cheaper, and you cannot tell what it would break
  • Inference cost is rising faster than revenue
  • You have a latency target the current model misses
  • Your provider has sent a deprecation notice

It is not, if

  • Your traffic is small enough that the bill does not matter yet
  • You want a model recommendation without testing it on your own cases
Questions

Before you book

What if we have no golden set?

We build one from your traces in the first week. It is included, and it stays in your repo for every migration after this one.

How much will we save?

We do not promise a number before measuring. The scorecard reports cost per task before and after on your own traffic, and you decide with that in front of you.

What if the cheaper model is worse?

Then the scorecard shows where, and the usual answer is routing: the cheaper model takes the cases it handles well and the rest stay where they are. If nothing clears the bar, you keep the current model and the evidence for why.

Will we need this again?

Every major model release raises the question again. With the harness in your repo, the next migration is a re-run rather than a project, and the Reliability Retainer can run it for you.

How does our data stay private?

NDA before anything is shared. We work with scoped read access inside your cloud or on de-identified samples, nothing goes to a third-party eval platform, and our copies are deleted at handover. The security page has the detail.

Next step

Start with a measured answer.

Audit the agent you already run, or pilot one workflow on your own documents. Either way, you leave with a number you can check.

Book a 30-min call →See both tracks →