Work orders on paper, quality logs in Excel, supplier documents in a shared inbox. We build the systems that read them, act on them, and prove their accuracy. The first step is a two-week Workflow Pilot on your own documents.
One workflow, about 200 of your real documents, and a measured answer at the end. The pilot is credited in full toward the build.
Real files from the workflow, scans and photos included, labeled with the people who do the work.
Scored per field and per document type, so a weak format shows up as a figure, not a surprise.
Where it broke, why, and what fixing each case would take.
A scoped proposal if the workflow is a fit, or an honest no with the evidence if it is not.
Do the arithmetic first: hours per week your team spends on the workflow, times their loaded hourly cost, times 52. That yearly figure is what the pilot and the build should be weighed against.
Supplier certificates, purchase orders and test reports extracted into structured data. Field-level accuracy is scored on your real documents rather than a demo set.
Defect and rework events tied to batch, station and shift, so patterns surface instead of being averaged away in a monthly summary.
Status updates, goods receipts and exceptions posted by an agent that escalates what it is unsure about, instead of a supervisor re-typing at 7pm.
10 articles on the systems, costs and trade-offs in this space.
It is the normal starting point. Scanned and photographed documents are exactly what the pilot tests against, and the accuracy number you get back is measured on those, not on clean PDFs.
No. We integrate with what runs today, including Tally, spreadsheets and email. The article library below covers when a bigger system is worth it.
With a two-week Workflow Pilot on one workflow and about 200 of your documents. Scope and fee are fixed on a call before kickoff, and the pilot is credited in full toward a build if you go ahead.
Next step
Two weeks gets it working on your own documents, with an accuracy number you can check. If the number is bad, you keep the failure analysis and walk away.